CEI AI Governance Database
Back to assessments
Row 55 · m055-algorithmic-recommendation-provisionsSupporting

Algorithmic recommendation provisions

Asia-PacificRegulatory/legaltopic page

Assessment outcome

total 3/4 (actionability 2 + currency 1); authority unscored, so pro-rated to 4.5/6

Total3/6
Actionability2/2
Authority
Currency1/2

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 4859 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The text explicitly establishes provisions for algorithmic recommendation technology and services.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

The provisions govern algorithmic recommendation activities, regulatory oversight, and compliance.

G4 · Attributablepass

Named translating and publishing organization provides clear attribution.

G5 · In forcepass

No text indicates that these provisions have been superseded, repealed, or withdrawn.

Scored criteria

Actionability

2/2

Level 2: Names specific obligations and controls providers must follow. [quote matched fuzzy, not verbatim]

Algorithmic recommendation service providers shall implement primary responsibility for algorithm security, establish and complete management systems and technical measures

Authority

NO SCORE — quote not found on the page, so the score was dropped as ungrounded. Model quoted: “Promulgating Entities: 国家互联网信惥办公室、中华人民共和国工业和信息化化部、中华人民共和国公安部、国家市场监督管理总局” · stated reason: Level 2: Official government document issued by state regulatory entities.

Currency

1/2

computed: newest date 2022-01-04 (via meta), ~4.6y old; past the 36-month standards_frameworks window for perspective 'Regulatory/legal' but within 72 months — plausibly still the reference → 1

Classification

Coverage topicalgorithmic recommendation provisions management
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
Trackgeneral
Granularitytopic page

Review notes

Pipeline flags

partial_scores:authority;quote_fuzzy:actionability;quote_invalid:authority